<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclipsed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/2010/01/eclipsed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/2010/01/eclipsed/</link>
	<description>my rest stop on the information superhighway</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kuban</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/2010/01/eclipsed/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kuban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/?p=1647#comment-801</guid>
		<description>@Dan: Yeah, I know about the redundancy on the RSS feeds. I wish there were a way to take care of that, and there probably is—with a set of complicated MT If-Then template tags. (&quot;If Category = Slice AND SE-homepage, then only output to X RSS feed.&quot;) But then you&#039;d have Slice-only subscribers missing out on things. It&#039;s problematic, I know.

Maybe we&#039;re too close to the process and can&#039;t view it from a reader end anymore. It&#039;s supposed to sort of work like Gawker when it has Defamer and Valleywag content pushed to the Gawker.com site (before those blogs were eventually subsumed into Gawker itself). I also view it sort of like Flickr—where you have your photo in your photostream but can also add it to different groups or sets. Here, it&#039;s like a Slice post that gets promoted to the main SE page or SENY, depending on relevance.

It probably gets even worse if you follow the Slice Twitter feed or are a fan of Slice on Facebook. Then you have the possibility of seeing the same thing 5 times. :-/ Imperfect, I know, but I don&#039;t know what the fix would be ...

@Donatello: I think it&#039;s not so much trying to differentiate it. I think it&#039;s good that they&#039;re moving more toward a unified voice and tone. Actually, I&#039;d like to think that one of the reasons the sites sound alike is that Ed Levine originally hired me largely because he liked the tone and feel of Slice and A Hamburger Today and wanted me to help direct SE toward that voice. So if they sound the same, I think I&#039;ve accomplished that. I would say there are some subtle differences. I probably get a little more ornery and let my hair down more on Slice, since I do feel like it&#039;s still my baby -- which, again, is probably why I&#039;m venting here about this issue—which really isn&#039;t a huge issue in the scheme of things. Really, I&#039;m happy that more people are now reading Slice and (more important) reading about great pizza thanks to its association with SE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan: Yeah, I know about the redundancy on the RSS feeds. I wish there were a way to take care of that, and there probably is—with a set of complicated MT If-Then template tags. (&#8220;If Category = Slice AND SE-homepage, then only output to X RSS feed.&#8221;) But then you&#8217;d have Slice-only subscribers missing out on things. It&#8217;s problematic, I know.</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;re too close to the process and can&#8217;t view it from a reader end anymore. It&#8217;s supposed to sort of work like Gawker when it has Defamer and Valleywag content pushed to the Gawker.com site (before those blogs were eventually subsumed into Gawker itself). I also view it sort of like Flickr—where you have your photo in your photostream but can also add it to different groups or sets. Here, it&#8217;s like a Slice post that gets promoted to the main SE page or SENY, depending on relevance.</p>
<p>It probably gets even worse if you follow the Slice Twitter feed or are a fan of Slice on Facebook. Then you have the possibility of seeing the same thing 5 times. :-/ Imperfect, I know, but I don&#8217;t know what the fix would be &#8230;</p>
<p>@Donatello: I think it&#8217;s not so much trying to differentiate it. I think it&#8217;s good that they&#8217;re moving more toward a unified voice and tone. Actually, I&#8217;d like to think that one of the reasons the sites sound alike is that Ed Levine originally hired me largely because he liked the tone and feel of Slice and A Hamburger Today and wanted me to help direct SE toward that voice. So if they sound the same, I think I&#8217;ve accomplished that. I would say there are some subtle differences. I probably get a little more ornery and let my hair down more on Slice, since I do feel like it&#8217;s still my baby &#8212; which, again, is probably why I&#8217;m venting here about this issue—which really isn&#8217;t a huge issue in the scheme of things. Really, I&#8217;m happy that more people are now reading Slice and (more important) reading about great pizza thanks to its association with SE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/2010/01/eclipsed/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/?p=1647#comment-800</guid>
		<description>One of the other problems is that the content is constantly re-pushed between the sites.  That particular article showed up in my feed reader 3 times - once for SE, once for SE:NY, and once for Slice.

So it doesn&#039;t really feel like the content &quot;belongs&quot; to Slice, more that it&#039;s Serious Eats content and it gets spread around to the appropriate blogs within the network.  (Same things happens with the AHT postings.)

Just my impression, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the other problems is that the content is constantly re-pushed between the sites.  That particular article showed up in my feed reader 3 times &#8211; once for SE, once for SE:NY, and once for Slice.</p>
<p>So it doesn&#8217;t really feel like the content &#8220;belongs&#8221; to Slice, more that it&#8217;s Serious Eats content and it gets spread around to the appropriate blogs within the network.  (Same things happens with the AHT postings.)</p>
<p>Just my impression, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donatello</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/2010/01/eclipsed/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Donatello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/?p=1647#comment-799</guid>
		<description>:( Even though I know Slice predates SE, etc, this post of yours made me realize that I definitely think of them as the same beast now. Same basic editorial tone, same layout, almost all the content is x-posted one way or the other. Maybe you can do something to help differentiate it more from the mothership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.adamkuban.com/kublog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Even though I know Slice predates SE, etc, this post of yours made me realize that I definitely think of them as the same beast now. Same basic editorial tone, same layout, almost all the content is x-posted one way or the other. Maybe you can do something to help differentiate it more from the mothership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

